Tim Cook Says Apple Had to Comply With Chinese Censors, and They'd Do It in the US Too. Last week, consumer tech giant Apple removed all major VPN apps from the Chinese branch of its Apps Store, seemingly putting yet another barrier in place for millions of Chinese citizens who might desire to defy their government’s pervasive internet censorship system. On Tuesday, Apple CEO Tim Cook explained why Apple chose to comply with the wishes of Chinese censors. It’s pretty simple, in Cook’s telling. Unlicensed VPNs are against the law in China now, and Apple has to obey the law, period.“The central government in China back in 2. VPN apps,” Cook told investors and media during Apple’s Q3 2. Tech. Crunch’s Matthew Lynley.

Essentially, as a requirement for someone to operate a VPN they have to have a license from the government there.”“Earlier this year, they began a renewed effort to enforce that policy,” he continued. Today there’s still hundreds of VPN apps on the app store, including hundreds by developers outside China.

We would obviously rather not remove the apps, but like we do in other countries we follow the law wherever we do business.”Here’s where Cook’s reply gets a little more cynical.“We believe in engaging with governments even when we disagree,” Cook continued. But he added if US law changed, Apple would have no choice but to comply.“In the case of China, the law is very clear there,” Cook said. That doesn’t mean that we don’t state our point of view in the appropriate way, we always do that.”Here’s the thing: Apple isn’t really “engaging” Chinese censors so much as complying with their orders, and there’s no way removing the VPN apps will somehow result in that censorship being “loosened.” It’s at best a tradeoff between maintaining market access on one hand, and collaborating with the current Chinese censorship system on the other. Without getting into an argument on the merits of Chinese artist Ai Weiwei’s work, he hit something on the head in a New York Times editorial earlier this year: “Whenever the state controls or blocks information, it not only reasserts its absolute power; it also elicits from the people whom it rules a voluntary submission to the system and an acknowledgment of its dominion.” While Apple’s decision to remove the VPN apps may be mandated by the “absolute power” of the Chinese state, it’s also clearly reinforcing part two of the equation, voluntary submission to said power.

Break through to improving results with Pearson's MyLab & Mastering. How To Make Games In Adobe Flash Cs3 Portable. We're working with educators and institutions to improve results for students everywhere. Search metadata Search full text of books Search TV captions Search archived web sites Advanced Search.

1. Click on this banner to see the other MP3 downloads + + + + + THE BigO AUDIO ARCHIVE Music Sharing Readers are welcomed to contribute and share their favourite.
2. The 2018 Audi A8 is here, and like all German flagship sedans it looks like it will be wildly over-engineered. Among the endless luxury features in the new sedan, one.
3. MOVIES (HISTORICAL FILMS) IN CHRONOLOGICAL ORDER (UNDER CONSTRUCTION -- I'm watching and writing about these movies as fast as I can, but it is going to take awhile.).
4. The Fallacious Arguments of Neo-Universalists by Sandy Simpson This DVD is a message based on this article. The new Universalists are not as vocal about their.

Cook, of course, is clearly aware of this—which is why he mentioned Apple would have no choice but to comply with a US censorship regime, too. He’s not exactly wrong.

But it’s also a reminder of how any abuse of power requires enablers, and institutions whose bottom line rely on compliance are probably not going to save anyone from autocracy. With a few exceptions, they’ll usually comply.

Elsewhere during the call, Cook noted, mainland China sales are doing just fine. The company’s poor performance was mostly due to poor sales in the mostly autonomous region of Hong Kong, which has much less restrictive laws on censorship.